Clinical and Academic Psychology arose in the late 19th century, partially as a reaction to the primitive ways society dealt with mental health problems at the time.

The prevailing medical model formed the basis upon which psychology grew. One is either healthy, or not. One has symptoms, or pathology, or one does not.

There's a lot to be said for this viewpoint in terms of physical health. But is it adequate for mental health? When it comes to psychology, should we strive only for a concept of normality, of lack of symptoms?

Some feel that to do so fails to include much that is unique about being human. What about Transcendent states? What about Bliss? What about rare moods that have no name, but that have a priceless, irreplaceable quality? Should psychology ignore those?

Spiritual paths, ancient philosophies, mystical and aesthetic traditions did not do so. Are they relevant in the 21st century?


You are welcome to comment on this page. You may also start your own discussion group within the site.